Well, in such a case, I expect that traps be sent to both destination IP 
addresses. In other words, I expect traps be set to all addresses returned by 
getaddrinfo provided an appropriate source address is available.

Best Regards,
Raghava

From: Bill Fenner [mailto:fen...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 July 2017 16:22
To: Raghava Kowshika Manjunatha <raghav...@cambiumnetworks.com>
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: net-snmp and FQDN

If net-snmp is running on a dual-stack host, and you give it a dual-stack 
destination, what is your desired behavior for this mode of operation?

  Bill


On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Raghava Kowshika Manjunatha via Net-snmp-users 
<net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
 wrote:
Hello,

We have integrated net-snmp into our application that runs on an embedded 
system.
We use net-snmp to send traps to user configured trap receivers.

Until now, users could have configured only an IP address for trap receivers.
Now, we have enhanced our system so that user can configure FQDN as well for 
trap receivers.

We would like to feed user configured FQDN into net-snmp so that net-snmp can 
resolve the FQDN into an IP and determine the transport domain (UDP or UDP6) 
before sending the traps.

  1.  Is this possible in any of the net-snmp release versions?
  2.  If not, what workaround do you recommend?

[ We currently, resolve FQDN into IP addresses and create trap sessions for 
each such resolved address. This works alright but has its own limitations. For 
example, DNS Server should be reachable when trap sessions are being created. 
Also if user decides to host trap receiver on a different server (same FQDN but 
different IP), then he will have to reconfigure the trap receiver on our device 
]

We use the following APIs to setup net-snmp for SNMP v1/v2c/v3 traps:

  1.  create_trap_session
  2.  snmpTargetAddrTable_create, snmpTargetAddrTable_add, 
snmpNotifyTable_create, snmpNotifyTable_add, snmpTargetParamTable_create, 
snmpTargetParamTable_add

We currently use net-snmp-5.4.2.1-ssl-1.

Best Regards,
Raghava

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
http://sdm.link/slashdot<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsdm.link%2Fslashdot&data=02%7C01%7Craghavakm%40cambiumnetworks.com%7C860b61acbbdb47231ecd08d4cd01de1a%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636358855286453170&sdata=rmvYKXoUNGgRaHKovp2aYcT3VM5UNI6hER6cLEjGpxs%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Fnet-snmp-users&data=02%7C01%7Craghavakm%40cambiumnetworks.com%7C860b61acbbdb47231ecd08d4cd01de1a%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636358855286453170&sdata=gYaeFizVrenXMZWckaLYrYaUiBQ6LfcpJhzoZcCxMf8%3D&reserved=0>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to