On 18.3.99 at 14:29, Wenchi Liao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a friend trying to get netatalk going on 64bit sol7, and failing > on the make kinstall (loaded, but not attached, or however that message > goes). Presumably, the rest (etc/afpd, etc) compiled without a hitch. I > had him try afpd -d -T and it just quits out. This is the 2.1.3 and the > test version of netatalk. Haven't had a chance to truss this to see > what's happening. yes. your friend and I have the same problem. I hadn't tried the A Sun 2.1.3 and now I have and it does the same thing as the umich 990130 -- which is the not attaching thing under 64-bit sol7, compiled with gcc 2.8.1. Fine to there, though. John Browning ||| 71 Richmond Ave ||| London N1 0LX t + 44 171 700 1230 ||| f + 44 171 700 5255
- [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris 7 John Browning
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... Allen Wittenauer
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... Michael Han
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... Wenchi Liao
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... John Browning
- [netatalk-admins] Subtle file corruption Yuji Shinozaki
- Re: [netatalk-admins] Subtle file corruption Bob Krzaczek
- Re: [netatalk-admins] Subtle file corruption Palle Girgensohn
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... John Browning
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Sol... Allen Wittenauer
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Sol... David S.
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... John Browning
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Sol... Andrew Snell
