On 19 Mar, John Browning wrote: > > yes. your friend and I have the same problem. I hadn't tried the A Sun 2.1.3 and now >I have and it does the same thing as the umich 990130 -- which is the not attaching >thing under 64-bit sol7, compiled with gcc 2.8.1. Fine to there, though. > > Well I can report that 'pre-asun2.1.4-2.tar.gz' compiled with the demo version of Sun's WorkShop 5.0 C compiler works fine under a 64 bit Solaris 7 kernel on a Sun Ultra 5. David S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > John Browning ||| 71 Richmond Ave ||| London N1 0LX > t + 44 171 700 1230 ||| f + 44 171 700 5255 > >
- [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris 7 John Browning
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... Allen Wittenauer
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... Michael Han
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... Wenchi Liao
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... John Browning
- [netatalk-admins] Subtle file corruption Yuji Shinozaki
- Re: [netatalk-admins] Subtle file corruption Bob Krzaczek
- Re: [netatalk-admins] Subtle file corruption Palle Girgensohn
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... John Browning
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Sol... Allen Wittenauer
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Sol... David S.
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Solaris... John Browning
- Re: [netatalk-admins] installation question: Sol... Andrew Snell
