>I think both of you look at this in a very limited way. I think there >should be both. Exactly, I heartily agree. this is all getting really silly. i understand that there are several rpmed versions of netatalk out there. nobody, however, has bothered sending me the rpm bits for any of them. that's a hint. -a
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Simon Buchanan
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Roland Schulz
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bl... Magnus Stenman
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bl... Patrik Schindler
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold win... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a col... Wenchi Liao
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Paul R. Potts
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- RE: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Marc Matteo
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth a sun
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Rich Lafferty
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth William P. McGonigle
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Michael Han
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bl... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold win... wesley . craig
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a col... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... wesley . craig
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Wenchi Liao
