--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does one NEED tcp wrappers to run atalk on Solaris? --- end of quote --- You start getting into philosophical issues here. Some people would say that you should make it as easy as possible to get up and running with netatalk. This means no security. Some would say that you shouldn't let users shoot themselves in the foot, even if it means preventing them from getting work done. Netatalk can get a bad wrap from being hard to use or as a potential security risk. I think hard to use is the better choice, myself. I'd distribute an RPM with crypt (should be legal now) and wrappers. That assumes that someone smart enough to do a source build is smart enough to consider the security ramifications; not necessarily true but probably a reasonable approximation. But I'm not doing the build. -Bill
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bl... Magnus Stenman
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bl... Patrik Schindler
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold win... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a col... Wenchi Liao
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Paul R. Potts
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- RE: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Marc Matteo
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth a sun
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Rich Lafferty
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth William P. McGonigle
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Michael Han
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bl... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold win... wesley . craig
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a col... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... wesley . craig
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Wenchi Liao
