The common thread in these two responses is that they're not compiling
with the latest glibc. However, I used to have netatalk as compiled on a
2.0.36 RHL system, but it was never visible on the EtherTalk network.
I'm currently using DAVE and Samba, so I have 20 days to solve my
problem :)
In the meantime, I'm trying to learn C really really fast, and then I
have to figure out how to debug a kernel module...
Buck Huppmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I'm using binaries of netatalk that I compiled when I had
> the 2.0.36 kernel running, before I installed RH 6 ...
a sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm running netatalk fine on a 2.2.9 kernel. i'm using glibc 2.0.7
> though, so that may be an issue.
Ryan Cleary wrote:
> I built netatalk-1.4b2+pre-asun2.1.4-28 on a RH 6.0 box, with
> kernel 2.2.5 (-22 was the kernel rpm build). I didn't enable any of the
> extra UAM options, just guest and cleartext access.
...
> I haven't tried 1.4b3 (and didn't even know it was available).
Sorry... I think that was a typo. It's supposed to be 1.4b2, just like
everyone thought :)
Thanks to all who responded!
Alex
