This is great info Alan and Edward, thank you!

I wonder if Greer's use of it in a novel is unique in some way, to warrant the 
prize.  I've found some articles about Nabokov and Joyce using it.  Mainly 
wondering if it could be a compositional element in Leonardo's works, and if 
yes what that would suggest.  Leonardo as labyrinthist?

GEB has a chapter about recursion (it follows the one on consistency) which I 
think might relate, so I will try to sift through that.  It mentions the 
concepts of "push," "pop," and "stack" as used in an early AI language "IPL" so 
maybe those relate to the layers of the onion?  I wonder if Dante used it too; 
if so that would have been an influence on Leonardo for sure.  It does seem 
like the Hollywood style of plot takes a different approach.  I wonder if 
chiastic structure is more associated with antiquity?  Perhaps it has an 
inclination toward "contemplative aesthetics" like mandala and labyrinth as 
opposed to -- not sure what, uncontemplative?

Definitely curious to hear if anyone has read Less.  It seems to quote Calvino 
a lot and the author lives in Tuscany as well as San Francisco, but every 
reference is buried and hidden in an enormous jumble.  Basically it seems like 
a solid book of chiasmus in the form of a world tour of literally everything.  
The work seems very ambitious in scope, to the extent that I wouldn't be too 
surprised to see a "new chiasticism" or something emerge, if such things still 
emerge.

The good part is that it's a comedy, about life going on, which is why it was 
chosen for my book club I think!  🙂

________________________________
From: NetBehaviour <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Alan Sondheim via NetBehaviour <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 4:00 PM
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity 
<[email protected]>
Cc: Alan Sondheim <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] question about a novel and "chiastic structure"

Look at Hua-Yen Buddhsim, Flower Ornament Sutra, Angkor Wat, Borobudur, etc. 
It's everywhere.
Same with Cathedral mazes etc.

Best, Alan -

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 2:55 PM Edward Picot via NetBehaviour 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:
Max,

I'm a big fan of chaistic structure - or the 'onion structure', which is 
another term for the same thing. You work your way inwards through various 
layers of narrative to reach the central point, then you work your way outwards 
through the same layers again, ideally in reverse order, to complete the story. 
There are examples of this kind of structure in fairy stories - a princess who 
is exiled does kind deeds to a bird, a toad and a fox, and then has to overcome 
a series of apparently-impossible challenges in which she is helped by the fox, 
the toad and the bird in repayment for her kindness. It's a very useful 
alternative to the prevailing 'three act' structure of (for example) most 
Hollywood movies, where everything is geared towards a massive 
cliffhanger/climax/confrontation/resolution at the end. The onion structure, by 
contrast, is more balanced, less end-heavy, and the turning-point/crux of the 
story tends to be the bit in the middle, the heart of the narrative, after 
which good luck turns to bad, the protagonist starts to reap the rewards of her 
good deeds, etc.

I suppose things like mandalas (and possibly mazes) might be examples of this 
kind of structure in the visual arts.

Edward

On 29/10/2020 18:00, Max Herman via NetBehaviour wrote:
Hi all,

My book club just read Andrew Sean Greer's novel Less, which won the Pulitzer 
Prize for fiction in 2018.  It seems to use a lot of "chiastic structure," 
which is an A-B-B'-A' pattern used in ancient literature.  There are also some 
biological meanings of the term (for vision and genetics).

I'd be curious to know if anyone is aware of chiastic structure in visual arts 
or perhaps computer systems.

Interesting idea Ricardo about the Rethinking Humanity idea!  Will be 
interested to hear/see more.

All best,

Max




_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


--
=====================================================
directory http://www.alansondheim.org tel 718-813-3285
email sondheim ut panix.com<http://panix.com>, sondheim ut 
gmail.com<http://gmail.com>
=====================================================
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to