It's the absence of the absence of either. On 3/5/2007, "james jwm-art net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm going to reply to this without reading the article and say: > >programming is a science if you don't know art, an art if you don't >know science. but to be honest, for me it's just programming. i'll >read it now. > >james. > >On 3/5/2007, "marc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Is programming an art or a science? Part II. >> >>In Part I of this 2 part series I put forth a standard argument about >>how programming is a science. In this part I want to explore an argument >>that says programming is an art. As I mentioned in Part I, this is a >>thought that I didnât even entertain until I was a good number of years >>into my career as a programmer. At this point, maybe the argument has >>some validity. Iâll let each of you make your own decision⦠>> >>This topic came up recently as my oldest daughter started looking into >>colleges. She is a high school senior, due to graduate in just a few >>weeks. As we looked at colleges I noticed several schools giving >>Bachelor of Arts degrees for computer science majors. In fact, according >>to this page at Wikipedia, there are many different degrees that are all >>considered more or less the same. Anyway, seeing the Bachelor of Arts >>degree made me think about the argument of whether programming is an art >>or a science, so naturally I had to create a couple of blog entries >>about it! >> >>more >>http://wapurl.co.uk/?7Q2LMZO >>_______________________________________________ >>NetBehaviour mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >> > >_______________________________________________ >NetBehaviour mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
