Re: [NetBehaviour] Programming - art or science?

[(?))))___]

assumming OS running on physical processor:---> Without an interface it must be entirely sealed within an object, any object (ie black box, red sphere, yellow pyramid). What would it be doing in there? Completely sealed. Any indication that it was inside would be an interface (yeah?). Any function provided by it outside of itself could only be by way of an interface(i think so). It could of course provide functionality to itself provided no indication of functionality outside of it exist(of course). Even the power cable too, that's an interface, a no-no, can't have(probably). Infact let's just say the thing can't even exist at all for practical purposes. --- <there is at least 2 sci fi short stories in this paragraph. 1. i've been thinking for years -thinking as writers think, not believing, but playing with the idea...- that the kaaba's black stone was a sort of unknown device. i relate it to the "thing" in kubrick's oddysey 2001. in this case, in this short story, the black stone would be sealed. i don't know why, but if i write the story, it would be no mistic development or enlightment... i'm bored of that. i would need to avoid that purpose and find another one. """"It could of course provide functionality to itself provided no indication of functionality outside of it exist (of course)""""" the power suply could be another power system. some wireless. >>> thanks for the explanation. if any would like to write with me this stories from this, please, help me, specially with the technical specifications. james jwm-art net escribió: On 4/5/2007, "_ b _" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: something to share just came to me reading what i've just read: ________the eye can reflect an image, but it doesn't mean that the thing reflected is "percieve". .... gombrich again percieving - art or science still thinking about A or B, still unable to think A and B simultaneously percieving programming as art is an art percieving programming as art is a science percieving programming as science is an art percieving programming as science is a science // plebian solution: art=0x2f10; science=0x310f; programming = (perception==art||perception==science) ? art&science : science&art; .... .... someone talked about games, the coding of games... i understand it is the same, isn't it? code ---> interface (to read, to modify pictures, to play games... ) mac and windows introduced interfaces; linux is pure code again... almost all operating system have an interface only pure code without interfaces is art-science ??? assumming OS running on physical processor:---> Without an interface it must be entirely sealed within an object, any object (ie black box, red sphere, yellow pyramid). What would it be doing in there? Completely sealed. Any indication that it was inside would be an interface (yeah?). Any function provided by it outside of itself could only be by way of an interface(i think so). It could of course provide functionality to itself provided no indication of functionality outside of it exist(of course). Even the power cable too, that's an interface, a no-no, can't have(probably). Infact let's just say the thing can't even exist at all for practical purposes. only pure code without interfaces is art-science only pure code without interfaces is art-science only pure code without interfaces is art-science only pure code without interfaces is art-science only pure code without interfaces is art-science only pure code without interfaces is art-science only pure code without interfaces is art-science only pure code without interfaces is art-science .... jwm-art kernel exception:0xbada555 ....>> 8. Skillful plan; device. [1913 Webster] They employed every art to soothe . . . the discontented warriors. --Macaulay. ..............[1913 Webster] _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour