hi, Have you read the fifth planet by fred hoyle? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hoyle
a planetary system is discovered on a trajectory toward passing close by earth. a group of astronaghts are sent to the fifth planet to investigate. they find a planet covered in green grass blues skies, and delusion... combine with the box idea, technology, virtual reality, == firewall. is that anywhere near your thinking? james. On 5/5/2007, "(?))))___" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> ><html> ><head> > <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-2" http-equiv="Content-Type"> ></head> ><body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> ><pre wrap="">assumming OS running on physical processor:---> Without an >interface it >must be entirely sealed within an object, any object (ie black box, red >sphere, yellow pyramid). What would it be doing in there? Completely >sealed. Any indication that it was inside would be an interface (yeah?). >Any function provided by it outside of itself could only be by way of an >interface(i think so). It could of course provide functionality to >itself provided no indication of functionality outside of it exist(of >course). Even the power cable too, that's an interface, a no-no, can't >have(probably). Infact let's just say the thing can't even exist at >all for practical purposes.</pre> >---<br> ><there is at least 2 sci fi short stories in this paragraph.<br> ><br> >1. i've been thinking for years <br> >-thinking as writers think, not believing, but playing with the idea...-<br> >that the kaaba's black stone<br> >was a sort of unknown device.<br> >i relate it to the "thing"<br> >in kubrick's oddysey 2001.<br> ><br> >in this case, in this short story,<br> >the black stone would be sealed.<br> ><br> >i don't know why, but if i write the story, <br> >it would be no mistic development or enlightment... <br> >i'm bored of that.<br> >i would need to avoid that purpose and find another one.<br> ><br> ><pre wrap="">""""It could of course provide functionality >to itself provided no indication of functionality outside of it exist >(of course)"""""</pre> >the power suply could be another power system. some wireless. <br> ><br> >>>> thanks for the explanation.<br> ><br> >if any would like to write with me this stories from this,<br> >please, help me, specially with the technical specifications.<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> >james jwm-art net escribió: ><blockquote cite="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > type="cite"> > <pre wrap="">On 4/5/2007, "_ b _" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" > href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"><[EMAIL PROTECTED]></a> wrote: > </pre> > <blockquote type="cite"> > <pre wrap="">something to share >just came to me >reading what i've just read: >________the eye can reflect an image, but it doesn't mean that the thing >reflected is "percieve". >..... gombrich again >percieving - art or science >still thinking about A or B, >still unable to think A and B simultaneously >percieving programming as art is an art >percieving programming as art is a science >percieving programming as science is an art >percieving programming as science is a science > </pre> > </blockquote> > <pre wrap=""><!---->// plebian solution: >art=0x2f10; >science=0x310f; >programming = (perception==art||perception==science) >? art&science : science&art; > </pre> > <blockquote type="cite"> > <pre wrap="">.... >..... someone talked about games, the coding of games... >i understand it is the same, isn't it? >code ---> interface (to read, to modify pictures, to play games... ) >mac and windows introduced interfaces; linux is pure code again... >almost all operating system have an interface >only pure code without interfaces is art-science >??? > </pre> > </blockquote> > <pre wrap=""><!---->assumming OS running on physical processor:---> Without > an interface it >must be entirely sealed within an object, any object (ie black box, red >sphere, yellow pyramid). What would it be doing in there? Completely >sealed. Any indication that it was inside would be an interface (yeah?). >Any function provided by it outside of itself could only be by way of an >interface(i think so). It could of course provide functionality to >itself provided no indication of functionality outside of it exist(of >course). Even the power cable too, that's an interface, a no-no, can't >have(probably). Infact let's just say the thing can't even exist at >all for practical purposes. > </pre> > <blockquote type="cite"> > <pre wrap="">only pure code without interfaces is art-science >only pure code without interfaces is art-science >only pure code without interfaces is art-science >only pure code without interfaces is art-science >only pure code without interfaces is art-science >only pure code without interfaces is art-science >only pure code without interfaces is art-science >only pure code without interfaces is art-science > </pre> > </blockquote> > <pre wrap=""><!---->.... >jwm-art kernel exception:0xbada555 >.....>> 8. Skillful plan; device. > </pre> > <blockquote type="cite"> > <blockquote type="cite"> > <pre wrap=""> [1913 Webster] > They employed every art to soothe . . . the > discontented warriors. --Macaulay. > ..............[1913 Webster] > </pre> > </blockquote> > </blockquote> > <pre wrap=""><!----> >_______________________________________________ >NetBehaviour mailing list ><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" >href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a> ><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" >href="http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour";>http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour</a> > > > </pre> ></blockquote> ><br> ></body> ></html> > > > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
