The talk I referred to was given in either 2002 or 2003. Interesting that we were essentially saying the same thing about the requirement for constant connectivity. But then again this was an issue that was being somewhat widely discussed if I recall correctly.
The reason I tagged the 2.0 on there was in reference to the term "Web 2.0". To me the whole idea behind "Web 2.0", where content is being updated constantly, day and night, every day, has a lot to offer for netart at a conceptual level. The idea that a work of art can at any given moment be reflecting not just semi-current but immediately current contemporary trends and issues regardless of the age of the work, I find highly intriguing. best r. Pall On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:24 PM, info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pall Thayer a écrit : > > There is a lot of other work that will stop functioning as > > soon as you disconnect from the Internet. I'm saying that that is Netart > > 2.0, the other work essentially just uses the Internet for distribution. > > > i agree 50% - i wrote that in 2002, but in french ... > http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-fr-0209/msg00020.html > > i disagree 50% - because you don't need "2.0" label, it's a definition > for "net art" > > ++ > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > -- ***************************** Pall Thayer artist http://www.this.is/pallit *****************************
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
