There's an interesting discussion regarding the Holy Fire exhibition going on at Rhizome: http://rhizome.org/editorial/fp/blog.php/590
Pall On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:18 PM, info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pall Thayer a écrit : > > The talk I referred to was given in either 2002 or 2003. Interesting > that we > > were essentially saying the same thing about the requirement for > constant > > connectivity. But then again this was an issue that was being somewhat > > widely discussed if I recall correctly. > > > > some people still think that net art does not need the net, and some > people think that art without a market is not art (check this: > http://www.imal.org/HolyFire/en/ ) > > i think that net art needs the net, like painting needs pigments, and > that art does not need a market to be art. > > as artists, we have to know what sense we put in words, this is also > what define our practices. your manifesto is a good exercise on this way. > > > The reason I tagged the 2.0 on there was in reference to the term "Web > 2.0". > > To me the whole idea behind "Web 2.0", where content is being updated > > constantly, day and night, every day, has a lot to offer for netart at a > > conceptual level. The idea that a work of art can at any given moment be > > reflecting not just semi-current but immediately current contemporary > trends > > and issues regardless of the age of the work, I find highly intriguing. > > > i like this idea, and work with it, but 2.0 label is a also a big > buzzword recovering many differents points of view, and blurring sense. > 2.0 is also a kind of catch-all in order to concentrate data within > proprietary platforms, while marketing the illusion of a global fun and > cool real time collaboration between so many "friends"... > > ++ > > > > > > best r. > > Pall > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:24 PM, info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Pall Thayer a écrit : > >> > >>> There is a lot of other work that will stop functioning as > >>> soon as you disconnect from the Internet. I'm saying that that is > Netart > >>> 2.0, the other work essentially just uses the Internet for > distribution. > >>> > >>> > >> i agree 50% - i wrote that in 2002, but in french ... > >> http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-fr-0209/msg00020.html > >> > >> i disagree 50% - because you don't need "2.0" label, it's a definition > >> for "net art" > >> > >> ++ > >> > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > -- ***************************** Pall Thayer artist http://www.this.is/pallit *****************************
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
