Forging Ahead

by Charles Stanish.

A little over a decade ago, archaeologists experienced a collective 
nightmare--the emergence of eBay, the Internet auction site that, among 
other things, lets people sell looted artifacts. The black market for 
antiquities has existed for centuries, of course, with devastating 
consequences for the world's cultural heritage. But we could at least 
take some comfort that it was largely confined to either high-end 
dealers on one end of the economic spectrum or rural flea markets on the 
other. The sheer physical constraints of transporting and selling 
illegal artifacts kept the market relatively small. But the rise of 
online auction sites promised to drastically alter the landscape. And so 
it did, just not in the dire way we had anticipated.

Even more remarkable than the growing demand for cheap fakes is the fact 
that the low-end market phenomenon is actually distorting the mid-range 
and lower high-end markets as well. Again, this seems counterintuitive. 
How could the selling of bad fakes and tacky tourist art as inexpensive 
antiquities distort the higher-end markets? Surely the sophisticated 
high-end buyers would not be affected by the rubes who pay $223 (plus 
$30 shipping from Lima) for a "genuine pre-Columbian Moche III Fineline" 
piece (which, by the way, can also be bought for $15 from the woman 
selling pottery outside the tourist buses in the Peruvian city of Trujillo).

But the high-enders are indeed affected. It was only a matter of time 
before a few workshops producing the cheap fakes started turning out 
reproductions that can fool even supposed experts like me. A number of 
these workshops have swamped the higher-end market with beautiful pieces 
that require intensive study by specialists and high-cost tests to 
authenticate. This manufacturing business never could have developed on 
such a scale without the Internet, and these forgers have forever 
transformed the antiquities market into something that we could not have 
imagined just a decade ago.

more...
http://www.archaeology.org/0905/etc/insider.html
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to