The issue I have with linux - it stops me cold - is video. I also think 
this is true for a lot of people who otherwise might switch to the OS. (I 
use it on an Asus EEE PC, on two old Sharp Zauruses, and on a Kubuntu 
flashdrive.) There's no support as far as I've been able to find for .mov 
or .avi which are pretty much standard. .mp4 plays as audio; there's no 
handling for the H264 compression among other things. There may be fixes 
and workarounds, but it's a nuisance. And unless you're an animation farm, 
the editing is useless. I also don't like Audacity for that matter - too 
much of it is obscure, and at least with CoolEdit I have total control 
over reverb/echo/sweetening, notch filters and the like. Linux is still a 
hacker's paradise (I use the command like all the time), but it's way 
behind on multimedia - and that's the way the world's going. So I'm stuck. 
Damn!

Can you say something about AHCI? (I think this is worthwhile for other 
users on these lists, since a lot of us work linux one way or another, and 
the OS is free, lean, and relatively fast.)

- Alan


On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, james morris wrote:

>
> Yeah I think you are probably right about AVG, I might have just got
> carried away there. It was Zone Alarm that was playing up. Last time I
> used ZA, it seemed fine - 3 months ago.
>
> Also, I've not really noticed any particular difference in disk speed
> between having AHCI on or off. In Linux, using the hdparm -t command
> shows very little difference in performance with AHCI on and disabled.
>
> There's an article on wikipedia about AHCI and Vista, with links to
> fixes. It's nice to see that Windows has a long list of problems with
> AHCI, while Linux is only struggling with one or two issues particular
> to certain hardware.
>
> Both Intel and AMD are contributing code to the Linux kernel for it to
> work with their new technologies within their latest processors (not
> that I can afford them) while Linux is also going to be the first OS to
> support the new USB3 hardware.
>
>
> On 15/8/2009, "Alan Sondheim" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> more reasons -
>>
>> the UAC is miserable. the audio balloons are almost impossible to turn
>> off. it's slower than XP. constant permission messiness with the console.
>> no tweakUI without paying for it. too much configuration - too many
>> effects to disable. AVG does work btw and auto-updates. I'm waiting for 7,
>> see if I can put it on top w/out losing efficiency or the programs I'm
>> using.
>> - alan
>>
>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, james morris wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> why i'm tempted to delete vista
>>> -------------------------------
>>>
>>> 1) I must disable SATA AHCI mode in the BIOS because Vista Home Premium
>>> can't handle it. Consequently the hard drives are not operating at full
>>> speed. If I don't do this, Vista crashes around 2 seconds after it
>>> first begins booting up.
>>>
>>> 2) I've got no software that makes using Vista worth the hassle. I have
>>> two games, Tomb Raider, and Crysis, but I can't be bothered to play
>>> them because it feels so unproductive and a waste of time learning how
>>> to.
>>>
>>> 3) Somewhere along the line while Windows was downloading and installing
>>> updates, it broke something. While I was fumbling around in Tomb Raider,
>>> Windows suddenly decided it had better things to do and began
>>> configuring updates. It got halfway along configuring update 2 of 3 and
>>> then decided it wouldn't bother after all... it rebooted the computer
>>> instead.
>>>
>>> 4) The firewall and anti virus software crashed and I can't be bothered
>>> to keep updating them either. They suck. So does the trial version of
>>> the Nero or something media player which does nothing but suck.
>>>
>>> 5) Because I don't ever use Vista. It would free up some disk space if I
>>> were to delete it.
>>>
>>> 6) It's good to do a bit of cleaning and dump things which are unused.
>>>
>>> 7) It's been at least 3 months since I used Vista. And I only used it
>>> then because someone sent me a Word document as an attachment. It seemed
>>> that OpenOffice.org could not read the contents. Turned out I was sent
>>> an empty document.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ONE NOT VERY GOOD REASON WHY I SHOULD NOT DELETE VISTA
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> 1) I might need it for some irritating reason, presently unknown to me,
>>> in the future.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> | current internet text file: http://www.alansondheim.org/qf.txt
>> | Alan Sondheim Mail archive:  http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>> | Webpage (directory) at http://www.alansondheim.org
>> | [email protected], [email protected], tel US 718-813-3285
>> ! http://www.facebook.com/alan.sondheim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>


| current internet text file: http://www.alansondheim.org/qf.txt
| Alan Sondheim Mail archive:  http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
| Webpage (directory) at http://www.alansondheim.org
| [email protected], [email protected], tel US 718-813-3285
! http://www.facebook.com/alan.sondheim

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to