i'd use slackware if i wasn't put off by the fact the type of people
who use it make videos like this :p

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qBGEmRn95g

the response is kinda funny.

On 20/8/2009, "ricardo ruiz" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>blah
>
>slackware is definatly the best OS in the world. current, 13.0 rc3, has
>kde4, many codecs and so on.
>
>
>hey, alan, you should try ubuntu studio.
>
>it can install a huge bunch of software for multimedia production, including
>video editing and so on
>
>
>best
>
>r
>
>2009/8/15 james morris <[email protected]>
>
>>
>> On 15/8/2009, "Alan Sondheim" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >The issue I have with linux - it stops me cold - is video. I also think
>> >this is true for a lot of people who otherwise might switch to the OS. (I
>> >use it on an Asus EEE PC, on two old Sharp Zauruses, and on a Kubuntu
>> >flashdrive.) There's no support as far as I've been able to find for .mov
>> >or .avi which are pretty much standard. .mp4 plays as audio; there's no
>> >handling for the H264 compression among other things. There may be fixes
>>
>> ffmpeg supports all these things, though while watching some of your
>> videos, there are warnings about brainfart (!?) cropping not being fully
>> supported. VLC is another good one, uses ffmpeg too. I've not recently
>> had any problems watching what you produce - I don't watch much video
>> tho - and that's in Debian which is always a bit behind the times.
>>
>> You should try a multimedia centric linux distro for sure.
>>
>> >and workarounds, but it's a nuisance. And unless you're an animation farm,
>> >the editing is useless. I also don't like Audacity for that matter - too
>>
>> I've occasionally tried video editing, having never got anywhere.
>>
>> I really don't like Audacity, the GUI is horrible. I never use it. Try
>> SND if you know scheme - which is where most of its functionality lies.
>>
>> >much of it is obscure, and at least with CoolEdit I have total control
>> >over reverb/echo/sweetening, notch filters and the like. Linux is still a
>>
>> I have total control over reverb/echo/sweetening, notch filters and the
>> like in Linux. I recently ported some old LADSPA plugins to the new LV2
>> standard. (LADSPA and LV2 are ways of writing plugins for linux audio
>> applications).
>>
>> For audio, you need JACK, ardour2 is superb though perhaps a bit overkill
>> for your requirements ( but i'm not familiar with cooledit ) as it's a
>> digital audio work station designed for pro studio usage/hard disk
>> recording etc. - Again get a multimedia centric Linux distro if you
>> don't care to set this up yourself.
>>
>> >hacker's paradise (I use the command like all the time), but it's way
>> >behind on multimedia - and that's the way the world's going. So I'm stuck.
>> >Damn!
>>
>> It's catching up slowly.
>>
>> >Can you say something about AHCI? (I think this is worthwhile for other
>> >users on these lists, since a lot of us work linux one way or another, and
>> >the OS is free, lean, and relatively fast.)
>>
>> AHCI? Advanced Host Controller Interface. It's some hardware thing for
>> SATA  hard drives and the like. It supersedes IDE.
>>
>>
>> James.
>>
>>
>> >On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, james morris wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Yeah I think you are probably right about AVG, I might have just got
>> >> carried away there. It was Zone Alarm that was playing up. Last time I
>> >> used ZA, it seemed fine - 3 months ago.
>> >>
>> >> Also, I've not really noticed any particular difference in disk speed
>> >> between having AHCI on or off. In Linux, using the hdparm -t command
>> >> shows very little difference in performance with AHCI on and disabled.
>> >>
>> >> There's an article on wikipedia about AHCI and Vista, with links to
>> >> fixes. It's nice to see that Windows has a long list of problems with
>> >> AHCI, while Linux is only struggling with one or two issues particular
>> >> to certain hardware.
>> >>
>> >> Both Intel and AMD are contributing code to the Linux kernel for it to
>> >> work with their new technologies within their latest processors (not
>> >> that I can afford them) while Linux is also going to be the first OS to
>> >> support the new USB3 hardware.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 15/8/2009, "Alan Sondheim" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> more reasons -
>> >>>
>> >>> the UAC is miserable. the audio balloons are almost impossible to turn
>> >>> off. it's slower than XP. constant permission messiness with the
>> console.
>> >>> no tweakUI without paying for it. too much configuration - too many
>> >>> effects to disable. AVG does work btw and auto-updates. I'm waiting for
>> 7,
>> >>> see if I can put it on top w/out losing efficiency or the programs I'm
>> >>> using.
>> >>> - alan
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, james morris wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> why i'm tempted to delete vista
>> >>>> -------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1) I must disable SATA AHCI mode in the BIOS because Vista Home
>> Premium
>> >>>> can't handle it. Consequently the hard drives are not operating at
>> full
>> >>>> speed. If I don't do this, Vista crashes around 2 seconds after it
>> >>>> first begins booting up.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2) I've got no software that makes using Vista worth the hassle. I
>> have
>> >>>> two games, Tomb Raider, and Crysis, but I can't be bothered to play
>> >>>> them because it feels so unproductive and a waste of time learning how
>> >>>> to.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 3) Somewhere along the line while Windows was downloading and
>> installing
>> >>>> updates, it broke something. While I was fumbling around in Tomb
>> Raider,
>> >>>> Windows suddenly decided it had better things to do and began
>> >>>> configuring updates. It got halfway along configuring update 2 of 3
>> and
>> >>>> then decided it wouldn't bother after all... it rebooted the computer
>> >>>> instead.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 4) The firewall and anti virus software crashed and I can't be
>> bothered
>> >>>> to keep updating them either. They suck. So does the trial version of
>> >>>> the Nero or something media player which does nothing but suck.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 5) Because I don't ever use Vista. It would free up some disk space if
>> I
>> >>>> were to delete it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 6) It's good to do a bit of cleaning and dump things which are unused.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 7) It's been at least 3 months since I used Vista. And I only used it
>> >>>> then because someone sent me a Word document as an attachment. It
>> seemed
>> >>>> that OpenOffice.org could not read the contents. Turned out I was sent
>> >>>> an empty document.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ONE NOT VERY GOOD REASON WHY I SHOULD NOT DELETE VISTA
>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1) I might need it for some irritating reason, presently unknown to
>> me,
>> >>>> in the future.
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> >>>> [email protected]
>> >>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> | current internet text file: http://www.alansondheim.org/qf.txt
>> >>> | Alan Sondheim Mail archive:  http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>> >>> | Webpage (directory) at http://www.alansondheim.org
>> >>> | [email protected], [email protected], tel US 718-813-3285
>> >>> ! http://www.facebook.com/alan.sondheim
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >| current internet text file: http://www.alansondheim.org/qf.txt
>> >| Alan Sondheim Mail archive:  http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>> >| Webpage (directory) at http://www.alansondheim.org
>> >| [email protected], [email protected], tel US 718-813-3285
>> >! http://www.facebook.com/alan.sondheim
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >NetBehaviour mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> >http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>
>
>
>--
>-----------
>:(){ :|:& };:
>Unix Shell Forkbomb (2002)
>
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to