Marc -

I'm going to be a little bit more critical about this. I think you've got a 
slight problem about visualising your audience - which is to say that at one 
moment your asking questions which seem to suppose that your audience members 
might not be very au fait with new media and network art at all - "Can you 
explain to anybody who might not have heard of it what Arduino is?" - but the 
next minute you're chatting about things which presuppose some quite advanced 
knowledge of the field. If you're going to get beyond the circle of people who 
are already into new media art and who know all about Furtherfield, Turbulence, 
Rhizome etc. etc., then you probably need to be quite structured in the way you 
approach your subject matter. For example, as regards the interview with the 
guy from the V&A, I think it would have probably been an idea to start by 
saying that the V&A have currently got two exhibitions on the go, one called 
Decode dealing with contemporary digital art, and the other one called Digital 
Pioneers dealing with the history of computer art - and maybe a brief 
description of what the two exhibitions are like (like a very boiled down 
version of Rob's review), with perhaps a few broad comments about whether you 
think they're worth a visit and if so why. This stuff pretty much all came out 
in the course of the interview, but if I was a listener who didn't know 
anything about the subject I'd like a nice clear introduction to what was going 
to be under discussion before the discussion began: something to give me points 
of reference, and thus a feeling of not being out of my depth. The same goes 
for the MsTech item (am I spelling that right?) - I think it would have helped 
to say what the MsTech team were setting out to do, how long they'd been around 
for, where they were based or where they're operating currently, and then start 
the interview.

Having said this, what was really nice about the programme was the feeling of 
friendly informality. Your voice is a very good one for the radio, I think, 
because you don't sound at all pompous or up your own arse, let alone smooth 
and smarmy - a nice bit of John Peel-style rummaging in your papers as you went 
along - and some nice down to earth remarks about how much things cost, what 
good value the catalogues were, and all that stuff. And I also liked your 
choice of musical tracks, especially that first one.

- Edward 
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to