> I think in the usual sense of the word, authenticity is more than > problematic - it's suspect. You can go all the way back to Warhol, you can > go through white jazz or blues, etc. - through Adorono - it's a mire. It > might be better to ask how art can function (yes, this brings up its own > problems) in a neoliberalist world - or what are the statuses of artworlds > for that matter?
I have a bottle of glue in one hand, and a perspex sheet in the other, a vision of beauty in my mind, and a compartmentalized heart, my wardrobe is full of cranberry juice, and my situation is suspect from evergreen ----- --------- space temporary bus stop I hope this does not appear rude. > > But there are also problems with 'simulacra,' which can be taken as a way > of avoiding what actually occurs for participants in given situations. If > you look at reality tv for example - which is of the spectacle, specular, > and a simulacrum in so many ways - you find labor, class, bodies behind > it. I worry about any categories; I recognize their academic use of > course, but they often seem to obscure in the long run. > > But then theory to me seems somewhat bankrupt itself... Bu t hen t heary t t t t seems somewat bankrupt in its hits shits elf Rick's Dangerous Space Port: http://jwm-art.net/art/image/3dfractal4.jpg Sally's Call Order: http://jwm-art.net/art/image/3dfractal5.jpg When can I go live in these places ^^^ ??? Can you give me directions please? It strikes me as common sense. -audio/image/text/code _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
