Hi
If you make still images of any sort with the intention of making art and post
them to Flickr,
please join the new Flickr group: Bollocks to James Elkins.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/bollocks_to_james_elkins/
and add a single image...
I'm pasting the rationale ( which is also on the group page) below.
If you don't use Flickr but see what I'm on about consider joining and posting
an image....
cheers
michael
PS if it takes off I'd like to think about organising a physical show of the
same name, no promises of course, lets see what happens...
*****
In his new book on photography (‘What Photography Is’, London and New York 2011
ISBN 978-0-415-99569-6) James Elkins, a writer always worth reading and to some
extent an art world iconoclast (though at every critical instant perhaps a
little less so that he imagines himself to be) gives vent to a magisterial rant
about those who post on Flickr, which is characterised by both a sad lack of
imagination and an unpleasant vein of snobbery.
It climaxes:
"If you are active on Flickr, if you read popular photography magazines, if you
enjoy National Geographic, if you use Photoshop to create effects, then this is
a critique of your work. It may not seem pertinent, buried as it is in the
middle of a book on many other things, but this is what a critique of your work
looks like."
I particularly relish the idea that anyone who chooses to use Flickr or
Photoshop, merely by that choice, is not only cast out from the
photographic/art world elect but is implicitly also rendered incapable of
recognising the majestic subtleties of Elkin’s thought without some nose
rubbing... Remember, just so you know,"this is what a critique of your work
looks like."
The banality of a criterion that is solely based upon the use or otherwise of a
technique or channel (a bureaucrat’s delight: "Photoshop!? Tick the box here:
not art!") won’t be lost on anyone with a little bit of wit, academic or no,
even we plebeians, above whom Elkins floats , Zeppelin-like, in such majestic
and Olympian disdain.
The criteria for rejecting a putative work of art cannot be solely how it is
made and whether any technique employed has at any time been clichéd or abused.
Such shortcuts are no substitutes for extended and fearless looking, thinking
and argument. The mark of artistic innovation is often precisely that it
elevates the previously unnoticed or despised technique, format or subject.
In the Goldberg Variations, after some of the most sublime and intellectually
demanding contrapuntal writing ever, Bach finishes with what? - A drinking song.
But there’s more to it. Elkins doesn’t really believe that the ignorant
Photoshoppers &c will really be reading his book and hence being directly
addressed by him. The diatribe and its climactic paragraph are a nod and a wink
to those on the inside, an invitation to join in a sneer at the intellectually
unwashed.
What is also manifested is a fear of pollution by rubbing shoulders too closely
with those non-insider masses. Despite Elkin’s brave words about the breadth of
his address to photography (and of course, implicitly, the signal failure of
anyone else to see why this matters or to do likewise effectively) there are
places he fears to tread. In the book he coldly contemplates, at length, the
foulest images of execution by torture but runs away from the snapshot and the
network.
Those of sterner stuff, who consider themselves to be making art and who use
Flickr as a conduit for that work are invited to join this group and post one
single example of their work. (You may replace/rotate but only one at any one
time). Photoshoppers and fans of National Geographic alike are welcome as is
anyone who photographs with the intention of making art and who feels that the
networked environment of Flickr is a useful place to post and share their work.
The only criterion is, I repeat, ‘Do you consider yourself, in any fashion, to
be attempting works of photographic art?’ If so, post one here and join us in
saying, collectively, ‘Bollocks to James Elkins!’.
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
