...FOR ME THIS ONE EXAMPLE/WITH JEW/IS ENOUGH CONSIDERED NATIONALISMS...I FIND MORE INTERESTING TENDENCY IN WIKIPEDIA TO SUPPORT MEMORYCID BECAUSE WE SHOULD DEMAND FACTS FOR EVERYBODY,FOR EVERY INNOCENT VICTIM:JEW,SERB,GREEK,LYBIAN...I FIND IT'S SCANDALIZE THAT CLINTON'S SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH MONICA LEWINSKY OCCUPY WHOLE PASSAGE,ON THE OTHER SIDE THERE'S MORE THAN 2000 DEAD SERBIAN CITIZEN WHO DOESN'T DESERVE EVEN ONE SENTENCE IN ARTICLE ABOUT CLINTON IN WIKIPEDIA,AND CLINTON'S ROLE IN THAT WAR/BOMBING SERBIA 1999/IS HIDEN...WE GIVE OUR BEST TO FIGHT AGAINST ANTI-SEMITISM TROUGH WROTE ON BLOGS,BUT WHAT CAN WE DO WITH CLINTON AND HIS CRIME?TO TELL TO SERBIAN AUDIENCE FACTS THEY KNOW VERY GOOD?..AS YOU KNOW WEST POWER/NATO/PUT LAST SUSPECT SERB IN HAGUE...BUT WHAT ABOUT CLINTON?...WE /I MEAN ALL PEOPLE ON THE WORLD/ HAVE RIGHT TO KNOW AT LEAST TRUTH AND FACTS ABOUT CLINTON AND HIS CRIME IN THAT WAR...WE MUST TAKE CARE ABOUT EVERY VICTIM OF WARS NO MATTER TO WHOM HE/SHE BELONG TO...IF WE WANT TO BE HONEST PEOPLE...MANIK...JANUARY...2012... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Sondheim" <[email protected]> To: "manik" <[email protected]>; "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] MANIK ABOUT WIKI
> > > Really depressing, I wonder how many other hatreds are in Wikipedia > articles - are there any articles elsewhere on Wikipedia and nationalisms? > Just wondering... > > Alan > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, manik wrote: > >> "??????? ?? ????????, ?? ?? ????? ????? ???????? ?? ??????? ?????? >> ???????." >> ''And we could see,from experience, that hate toward people for Jew is >> principle for survival.''/translate from Serbian to English/ >> /http://sr.wikiquote.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D1%85_%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0 >> %B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B0 / >> This is example from Wikipedia on Serbian...who want to spend few minute >> more he could see that this sentence stay on the end of Spinoza chosen >> quotation.From our experience- beginning and end of some text are most >> significant parts .So,it's obvious-somebody from Serbian board for >> wikipedia >> on Serbian language want to ruin our insight in Spinoza's philosophy by >> that/maybe even wrong quote/. Why?Who want to spread hate and >> antisemitism >> via wikipedia here,in Serbia?What could be reason for that?BTW:in Serbian >> blogs we could find significant anti Jew texts. >> This is just introduction in next:in wikipedia text about Bill Clinton / >> former president of USA/ and his role in bombing Serbia/1999/ take *part >> of >> one sentence*!!!Who work against truth in wikipedia???...And...Is that so >> very important what's happened in USA Congress considered obvious >> wikipedia >> tendency to act in posthistory style/arbitrary facts,cover up and leave >> put/. Maybe it's time to think about those things before we ''Occupy >> wikipedia space''/...he,ha,he.../...MANIK...JANUARY...2012... >> ????? ??????? ? Wikiquote >> sr.wikiquote.org >> >> > > == > eyebeam: http://eyebeam.org/blogs/alansondheim/ > email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/ > web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 347-383-8552 > music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/ > current text http://www.alansondheim.org/rh.txt > == _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
