I can't answer for Clinton but you can thank the republicans for Lewinsky
- which had nothing to do with his presidency; they turned it into a
national pasttime to kill off him and his social agenda; we got Bush
instead...
- Alan
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, manik wrote:
...FOR ME THIS ONE EXAMPLE/WITH JEW/IS ENOUGH CONSIDERED NATIONALISMS...I
FIND MORE INTERESTING TENDENCY IN WIKIPEDIA TO SUPPORT MEMORYCID BECAUSE WE
SHOULD DEMAND FACTS FOR EVERYBODY,FOR EVERY INNOCENT
VICTIM:JEW,SERB,GREEK,LYBIAN...I FIND IT'S SCANDALIZE THAT CLINTON'S SEXUAL
RELATIONSHIP WITH MONICA LEWINSKY OCCUPY WHOLE PASSAGE,ON THE OTHER SIDE
THERE'S MORE THAN 2000 DEAD SERBIAN CITIZEN WHO DOESN'T DESERVE EVEN ONE
SENTENCE IN ARTICLE ABOUT CLINTON IN WIKIPEDIA,AND CLINTON'S ROLE IN THAT
WAR/BOMBING SERBIA 1999/IS HIDEN...WE GIVE OUR BEST TO FIGHT AGAINST
ANTI-SEMITISM TROUGH WROTE ON BLOGS,BUT WHAT CAN WE DO WITH CLINTON AND HIS
CRIME?TO TELL TO SERBIAN AUDIENCE FACTS THEY KNOW VERY GOOD?..AS YOU KNOW
WEST POWER/NATO/PUT LAST SUSPECT SERB IN HAGUE...BUT WHAT ABOUT CLINTON?...WE
/I MEAN ALL PEOPLE ON THE WORLD/ HAVE RIGHT TO KNOW AT LEAST TRUTH AND FACTS
ABOUT CLINTON AND HIS CRIME IN THAT WAR...WE MUST TAKE CARE ABOUT EVERY
VICTIM OF WARS NO MATTER TO WHOM HE/SHE BELONG TO...IF WE WANT TO BE HONEST
PEOPLE...MANIK...JANUARY...2012...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Sondheim" <[email protected]>
To: "manik" <[email protected]>; "NetBehaviour for networked distributed
creativity" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] MANIK ABOUT WIKI
Really depressing, I wonder how many other hatreds are in Wikipedia
articles - are there any articles elsewhere on Wikipedia and nationalisms?
Just wondering...
Alan
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, manik wrote:
"??????? ?? ????????, ?? ?? ????? ????? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????
???????."
''And we could see,from experience, that hate toward people for Jew is
principle for survival.''/translate from Serbian to English/
/http://sr.wikiquote.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D1%85_%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0
%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B0 /
This is example from Wikipedia on Serbian...who want to spend few minute
more he could see that this sentence stay on the end of Spinoza chosen
quotation.From our experience- beginning and end of some text are most
significant parts .So,it's obvious-somebody from Serbian board for
wikipedia
on Serbian language want to ruin our insight in Spinoza's philosophy by
that/maybe even wrong quote/. Why?Who want to spread hate and antisemitism
via wikipedia here,in Serbia?What could be reason for that?BTW:in Serbian
blogs we could find significant anti Jew texts.
This is just introduction in next:in wikipedia text about Bill Clinton /
former president of USA/ and his role in bombing Serbia/1999/ take *part
of
one sentence*!!!Who work against truth in wikipedia???...And...Is that so
very important what's happened in USA Congress considered obvious
wikipedia
tendency to act in posthistory style/arbitrary facts,cover up and leave
put/. Maybe it's time to think about those things before we ''Occupy
wikipedia space''/...he,ha,he.../...MANIK...JANUARY...2012...
????? ??????? ? Wikiquote
sr.wikiquote.org
==
eyebeam: http://eyebeam.org/blogs/alansondheim/
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 347-383-8552
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/rh.txt
==
==
eyebeam: http://eyebeam.org/blogs/alansondheim/
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 347-383-8552
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/rh.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
