On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:09:10 +0000, marc garrett wrote:
>
> There are two tell-tale words here: abstraction and control. In order 
> to
> manage a cloud, there needs to be a monitoring system which controls 
> its
> functioning, a system which is by definition hidden from the 
> end-user.

He's trailing American beards here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/sep/29/cloud.computing.richard.stallman

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/events/2010/isoc-ny/FreedomInTheCloud-transcript.html

Abstraction in itself isn't necessarily a bad thing. We don't program 
computers using physical switches or assembly code any more, and that's 
probably a gain. But the abstractions in cloud computing are 
*managerial* and *obfuscatory*.

> The paradox is thus that, as the new gadget (smartphone or tiny
> portable) I hold in my hand becomes increasingly personalized, easy 
> to
> use, “transparent” in its functioning, the more the entire set-up has 
> to
> rely on the work being done elsewhere, on the vast circuit of 
> machines
> which coordinate the user’s experience.

That's not a paradox. For me to do less work but for the work still to 
be done the work must happen elsewhere. The problem is who controls that 
work and as a result my sense of individuality/individuation.

Mass aesthetic personalisation can, and under capital probably must, be 
produced by mass social and technical depersonalisation.

Artists can usefully intrude in this.

> In other words, for the user
> experience to become more personalized or non-alienated, it has to be
> regulated and controlled by an alienated network.

This is "deskilling". I don't know how deskilling relates to 
alienation. (I mean I really don't, not that I'm being obtuse. :-) )

It's perfectly possible for us to be alienated from our own devices 
without the cloud, that's what proprietary software does. Likewise a 
non-alienated cloud is (just about) conceivable both economically and 
technologically if it's a co-op or p2p setup using commodity software 
and hardware.

- Rob.

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to