On 22/08/13 09:34 PM, James Morris wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2013 1:31 AM, "Rob Myers" <r...@robmyers.org > <mailto:r...@robmyers.org>> wrote: >> >> [Via everyone] "Artist's chip implant sends animated GIFs to his phone" - > > sounds a bit pointless and typically indulgent promotion of artist > wackiness crap. can only imagine. maybe the gifs are generated from > static discharge of pubic lice or something. can only imagine as really > can't be bothered to read it and neither should you.
This may be an example of my low expectations distorting my enthusiasm for something but I was happy that the headline matched the content. It's an actual implant, it is storing the data rather than a URL, it is sending the data to a phone, it is reprogrammable. The mark of the beast being an animated GIF is a nice touch, as I loathe animated GIF hipsterism. The thought of one actually being under my skin makes my flesh creep... ;-) _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
