Sorry, both of the comments below are a wee bit too obscure for me…
M From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Radovan Misovic Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 2:26 PM To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] FW: Blogpost: "Snowden isn't just about Surveillance. It is much, Much, MUCH worse... Historical analogy on Tor network. ++ Connection closed by remote ghost. _____ From: "Bezdomny" <[email protected]> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 4 October, 2013 6:47:04 AM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] FW: Blogpost: "Snowden isn't just about Surveillance. It is much, Much, MUCH worse... La Cosa Nostra has distributed commands anonymously for over a century using little slips of paper delivered hand-to-hand via innumerable intermediaries. On Oct 3, 2013 6:34 PM, "michael gurstein" <[email protected]> wrote: Precisely what "fiddling" they are actually doing (apart from the enormously revealing Stuxnet) isn't clear (yet?), but that they are in principle able to do pretty much anything they want in intervening in the bitstream is I think quite evident. My guess would be that a lot of various types of intervention is still quite labour intensive but I would be very surprised if they weren't working on useable tools. M
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
