On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:56:58 -0700 Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23/03/14 02:44 PM, James Morris wrote: > > > > Then I thought about how the relevant politicians are going to be > > up to their eyeballs in this sort of whining > > The more people write, the more votes they'll see in it. What struck my mind was the possibility they'll see a greater need for this kind of behaviour (fair use copying/parody/etc) to be criminalized. > > and why the hell shouldn't I pay. > > Because you already bought it? Yes, in a format for a particular device type. If I want to listen to it using other devices... Ah yes, there's a vague memory of the argument here... it's all digital... or am I straying into relativism? hmmm I honestly don't know anything other than I probably shouldn't try to argue unpopular points of view with people on the internet. > > *"&* asking for permission to parody. > > The temptation is to submit a Downfall parody explaining why it's > illegal, although - actually I'm going to stop there as I was about to > Godwin. I kind of realize my statement above is missing the point, but at the same time... > > - Rob. > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
