On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:04:32 +0100
James Morris <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 21:50:53 -0400
> roboslob <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > this isn't very soshuL
> > 
> nor is being thick
> 

ps i wasn't pointing the finger there, this is no accusation! looking at
the way you spelt social, invert and apply to the word "this", and you
get the non-word 'thic', add a 'k' and the word 'being'.


> > i don't have many options here
> > 
> and you have fewer here (where you are just a collection of ascii
> characters)
> 
> > satisfaction is hard to come by hear
> > 
> ssssh, you might just catch a glimpse - just there
> 
> > we're blasting each other with our-put
> > 
> dzzzrrrrr! dzzzrrrrr! dzzzrrrrr!
> 
> > i used to have 3 friends now i have 50
> > 
> i never had 50 friends, now i don't have 3
> 
> > all we're seeking is experience in the me-dia
> > 
> 
> speak and spell for your elves!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to