-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22/07/14 12:23 AM, dave miller wrote:
> 

Yikes I meant to respond to this much sooner.

> I particularly like FRAMED. I've been wandering around this issue
> for years, about the way that digital art is consumed, and feeling
> that galleries are not the place for my work. Perhaps digital art
> doesn't need to be restricted by the gallery system, maybe it
> doesn't need it at all - apart from some kind of validation that
> could be achieved in other ways. The music market has been
> radically changed by networked media; the book market is about to
> become the same with Amazon's subscription models. The art market
> relies so much on the scarcity of the object and this conflicts
> with digital art's endless reproductions.

Yes the aura of curation and scarcity seems to make people more
interested in things. Attention is scarce even post-material-scarcity
I guess.

It's tempting to produce a Free Software alternative to FRAMED with a
Raspberry Pi-based system that allows people to curate arbitrary
digital art. Some sort of FurtherFrame...

> These networked frames could work well. Networked framed art on
> your wall, great beautiful art, following your tastes, changing all
> day, on subscription. I think you'd be able to interact with the
> frames, which opens up lots of collaborative possibilities.

Yes collaborative art rather than broadcast art would be a very good
use of this technology.

- - Rob.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT6ChuAAoJECciMUAZd2dZQUcH/1ERab6/SQJKSQG5IiThVo1I
QS2y9U2ojPFywEfqIJlGHEsXUVAk3OL056SUWGCA3OC406MT7CvvYQ/ys3iyTec4
V+kO0CbIN+nvWrqIy3BpMGDKr/r5JUIfASrUjStwQDq9vGgme7lkyc98V+9Og927
mV2NSm/wceqq7PeLjBiawKG7nKA8YH8zoeeiiQplod3X2mOabLF7Zj9QYIE4M16A
Z1lz51VdTAQlqciTs9m4x9AdGpEueA+kmbUP4Il0j22O1gLW3x0TrprrZ3dKjkw4
AWmxoMHcDMItjZTtsaGJyAM3DZklXEG0oGuD/nbyBZoapfzkQS/MQm4rKWM/SBU=
=l6mi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to