Hi rob
Thanks for your ideas. We should talk more about this. The furtherframe
idea is great.
Do you know how to program the raspberry pie? I'd be keen to have a go.  I
need to read more about the frames and how they will work tech wise.
Getting away from the broadcast model i think is important though very
tricky. True that people like curation and scarcity. Some sort of
validation must be there I suppose...?
Dave
On 11 Aug 2014 03:20, "Rob Myers" <r...@robmyers.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 22/07/14 12:23 AM, dave miller wrote:
> >
>
> Yikes I meant to respond to this much sooner.
>
> > I particularly like FRAMED. I've been wandering around this issue
> > for years, about the way that digital art is consumed, and feeling
> > that galleries are not the place for my work. Perhaps digital art
> > doesn't need to be restricted by the gallery system, maybe it
> > doesn't need it at all - apart from some kind of validation that
> > could be achieved in other ways. The music market has been
> > radically changed by networked media; the book market is about to
> > become the same with Amazon's subscription models. The art market
> > relies so much on the scarcity of the object and this conflicts
> > with digital art's endless reproductions.
>
> Yes the aura of curation and scarcity seems to make people more
> interested in things. Attention is scarce even post-material-scarcity
> I guess.
>
> It's tempting to produce a Free Software alternative to FRAMED with a
> Raspberry Pi-based system that allows people to curate arbitrary
> digital art. Some sort of FurtherFrame...
>
> > These networked frames could work well. Networked framed art on
> > your wall, great beautiful art, following your tastes, changing all
> > day, on subscription. I think you'd be able to interact with the
> > frames, which opens up lots of collaborative possibilities.
>
> Yes collaborative art rather than broadcast art would be a very good
> use of this technology.
>
> - - Rob.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT6ChuAAoJECciMUAZd2dZQUcH/1ERab6/SQJKSQG5IiThVo1I
> QS2y9U2ojPFywEfqIJlGHEsXUVAk3OL056SUWGCA3OC406MT7CvvYQ/ys3iyTec4
> V+kO0CbIN+nvWrqIy3BpMGDKr/r5JUIfASrUjStwQDq9vGgme7lkyc98V+9Og927
> mV2NSm/wceqq7PeLjBiawKG7nKA8YH8zoeeiiQplod3X2mOabLF7Zj9QYIE4M16A
> Z1lz51VdTAQlqciTs9m4x9AdGpEueA+kmbUP4Il0j22O1gLW3x0TrprrZ3dKjkw4
> AWmxoMHcDMItjZTtsaGJyAM3DZklXEG0oGuD/nbyBZoapfzkQS/MQm4rKWM/SBU=
> =l6mi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to