Mez, I would like to share the mesostic that John Cage wrote for me in 1992 (three days before he died, his very last), which I think resonates with your words + language:
Zero In time And space We asK foR nOthing To be the Source Of what Is doNe Our acTion Is to bE wheRe eAch of us is togetheR In The nothing In between uS the nothing in between John Cage (the original netartizen) For the actual mesostic in its original form: http://zakros.com/about/ (scroll to bottom of page) From: mez breeze <[email protected]> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 8:34 PM To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] NetArtizen #tip2 NetArtizen #tip -3 No-one there is [we] NetArtizen #tip -2 We[ll], there *is* no one NetArtizen #tip -1 No[t] one, there we is. NetArtizen #tip 0 There is no one We...Therein [lies] no one. We/There is/no[t] one/we. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, ruth catlow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > NetArtizen #tip2 There is no one We > > > > > On 03/03/15 10:59, ruth catlow wrote: > > >> >> On 02/03/15 22:55, mez breeze wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:15 AM, [T]ruth wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Net[TED+HE]Art-i-zen["this2shallpass] #[s]t[r]ip1[+paint2]: >>>> [inf]init[e_str]iat[ions_m]e[et] >>>> [s]and[s_shift_+present]particip[les(s|+|condens)]ate[Moore(d)]in_equal_mea >>>> sure. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> | mezbreezedesign.com <http://mezbreezedesign.com> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
