On 04/03/15 01:34, mez breeze wrote:
NetArtizen #tip2.3 No-one there is [we]
NetArtizen #tip2.2 We[ll], there *is* no one
NetArtizen #tip2.1 No[t] one, there we is.
NetArtizen #tip2.0 There is no one We...Therein [lies] no one.
We/There is/no[t] one/we.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:00 AM, ruth catlow
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
NetArtizen #tip2 There is no one We
On 03/03/15 10:59, ruth catlow wrote:
On 02/03/15 22:55, mez breeze wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:15 AM, [T]ruth wrote:
Net[TED+HE]Art-i-zen["this2shallpass] #[s]t[r]ip1[+paint2]:
[inf]init[e_str]iat[ions_m]e[et]
[s]and[s_shift_+present]particip[les(s|+|condens)]ate[Moore(d)]in_equal_measure.
--
| mezbreezedesign.com <http://mezbreezedesign.com>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
