On Wed, 25 May 2016, at 07:17 AM, Antonio Roberts wrote: > I recently made an ident for MTV that was shown everywhere apart from > the UK. This was due to the ident containing "Potentially Harmful" > content. I've never worked in broadcast before and, whilst I know > flashing imagery should be avoided, I didn't know stripes were > disallowed.
I wouldn't have thought of that either but stripes moving at speed will flash. This is like a car driving through the shadows cast by tree branches on a sunny day. > I've described this whole process here > http://www.hellocatfood.com/potentially-harmful/ > > Does this render a lot of glitch art/new media/digital art > unboradcastable? You've created art that is resistant to media distribution. In 2016. That's awesome! And potential problems are identified by machine - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harding_test Which makes this an example of algorithmic critique as well. So to answer your question - more energetic examples of glitch/new media would need a certificate. I wonder if institutions that collect such art have access to Harding testing? _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
