we had recently a conversation on LGM list about this - broadcasting not
suitable for photo sensitive people - there's some UK based advice on it
here on flashing images that may cause harm to viewers:

https://www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/photosensitive-epilepsy/triggers
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/guidance/bguidance/guidance2.pdf

best,
lara

On 26/05/16 01:34, Alan Sondheim wrote:
> 
> There is a very famous case in Japan, of a children's anime which
> created seizures in children; later it was shown on a newscast and even
> more people had them. I've always had to be careful with my own work
> which has flickered at times. - Alan
> 
> 
> On Wed, 25 May 2016, marc garrett wrote:
> 
>> Hi Antonio,
>>
>> Yes, I agree with Rob.
>>
>> You've made yourself extra cool without meaning to ;-)
>>
>> marc
>>
>> On 25 May 2016 at 19:59, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>       On Wed, 25 May 2016, at 07:17 AM, Antonio Roberts wrote:
>>       > I recently made an ident for MTV that was shown everywhere
>>       apart from
>>       > the UK. This was due to the ident containing "Potentially
>>       Harmful"
>>       > content. I've never worked in broadcast before and, whilst I
>>       know
>>       > flashing imagery should be avoided, I didn't know stripes were
>>       > disallowed.
>>
>>       I wouldn't have thought of that either but stripes moving at
>>       speed will
>>       flash. This is like a car driving through the shadows cast by
>>       tree
>>       branches on a sunny day.
>>
>>       > I've described this whole process here
>>       > http://www.hellocatfood.com/potentially-harmful/
>>       >
>>       > Does this render a lot of glitch art/new media/digital art
>>       > unboradcastable?
>>
>>       You've created art that is resistant to media distribution.
>>
>>       In 2016.
>>
>>       That's awesome!
>>
>>       And potential problems are identified by machine -
>>
>>       https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harding_test
>>
>>       Which makes this an example of algorithmic critique as well.
>>
>>       So to answer your question - more energetic examples of
>>       glitch/new media
>>       would need a certificate.  I wonder if institutions that collect
>>       such
>>       art have access to Harding testing?
>>       _______________________________________________
>>       NetBehaviour mailing list
>>       [email protected]
>>       http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>>
>> Marc Garrett
>> Co-Founder, Co-Director and main editor of Furtherfield.
>>
>> Furtherfield - A living, breathing, thriving network
>> http://www.furtherfield.org - for art, technology and social change since
>> 1996
>>
>> Furtherfield Gallery & Commons,
>> Finsbury Park, London N4 2NQ
>> T +44(0)208 802 1301/+44(0)208 802 2827
>> M +44(0)7533676047
>> www.furtherfield.org
>>
>>
> 
> ==
> email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
> web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
> music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
> current text http://www.alansondheim.org/ty.txt
> ==
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 

-- 
http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2016/
-
http://www.e-w-n-s.net/
-
http://dataunion.org.uk/
-
http://www.commonhouse.org.uk/whos-involved/autonomous-tech-fetish/
-
http://write.flossmanuals.net/
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to