On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:53:42AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > Use ping, not ssh, to be able to have a more isolated test case and get > quantitative data. In particular, separate loss from delay; both > present as delay over TCP. 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=6.781 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.283 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.982 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=4.147 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.320 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.520 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.993 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=2.595 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1.951 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=2.224 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1.960 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=3.283 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1.937 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=2.325 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=1.960 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=1.965 ms ^C ----router PING Statistics---- 25 packets transmitted, 16 packets received, 36.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.937/2.639/6.781/1.253 ms
I think 36% is a large number for packet loss? How can this be checked further? Actually my main router is not DD-WRT. It runs proprietary firmware (Lava W150). I was using WRT160NL DD-WRT more as a range extender. But to reduce the variables, currently I am directly connecting to the main router. where I don't have a way to examine the packets. Mayuresh