In article <20130620091543.ga29...@sdf.org>, Mayuresh <mayur...@acm.org> wrote: >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:53:42AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: >> Use ping, not ssh, to be able to have a more isolated test case and get >> quantitative data. In particular, separate loss from delay; both >> present as delay over TCP. >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=6.781 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.283 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.982 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=4.147 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.320 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.520 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.993 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=2.595 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1.951 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=2.224 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1.960 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=3.283 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1.937 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=2.325 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=1.960 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.169.1: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=1.965 ms >^C >----router PING Statistics---- >25 packets transmitted, 16 packets received, 36.0% packet loss >round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.937/2.639/6.781/1.253 ms > >I think 36% is a large number for packet loss?
It is a miracle that you can actually type through it. christos
