Greg A. Woods wrote in
<m1syl91-0036s2C@more.local>:
|At Wed, 09 Oct 2024 22:45:17 +0200, Steffen Schönbein <stef...@sdaoden.eu> \
|wrote:
|Subject: Re: 2. Greylisting
|>
|> so that after a bot passed by gray listing it will have to stand
|> sender address verification, and this is where most of them (and
|> not only bots) fail.
|
|Exactly. Get rid of the counter-productive greylisting delay for all
|good mail and just do the regular and necessary-anyway verifications and
|get on with it!
Then everybody can force me to send an email, right away, no?
Problem is also that i need a whitelist because some valid
endpoints just fail the verification; ok i could add a LMDB access
database, i have this
# Total no-goes database, eg: qq.com reject
#check_sender_access lmdb:$meta_directory/sender_restrict,
but it is commented out. Would be interesting to know what is
more resource eating, doing whitelist via the policy daemon (that
runs anyway) or via DB that does file locking etc.
Until now i only have
check_sender_access inline:{$mydomain=reject},
But yes, *if* i would have extended the verify code of postfix to
do a graylist-reject once, for the given reasons, i would agree.
--End of <m1syl91-0036s2C@more.local>
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
