El 11/6/26 a las 14:07, Robert Elz escribió:
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:49:58 +0200 From: Ramiro Aceves <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]>| just wanted to know wether I was doing something wrong. No, nothing wrong at all, you're correctly fetching our broken source trees, which are "correctly" failing to build... You shouldn't normally need -A on the cvs update though, that's needed only after you have updated to some other version, and want to forget that and go back to head. If you want to try something that should build now, do cvs update -r netbsd-11 -dP (the -P here is redundant, the branch switch implies it, but it is good practice to specify on all cvs update commands) This will switch your sources to the netbsd-11 branch (you'll only need the -r option once, then as long as you don't use -A, you'll remain on that branch (which gets fare less frequent changes than HEAD does, there can be weeks between any updates). A later update with -A (and no -r) will return you to HEAD. kre
Thanks so much Robert for your explanation, I appreciatte it very much and I understand it better now. I am going to try NetBSD-11 and see what happens.
Regards.
