I just had a look at your url. It looks really good. I had it running in nb 9rc1 under java 8 and tryed out some of what you said. But then downloaded Product Version: Apache NetBeans IDE 9.0 (Build incubator-netbeans-release-334-on-20180708) Java: 10.0.1; Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 10.0.1+10
And the options of installing java web and java ee are not avaliable. I was thinking about doing a web cast with some of the examples that you gave On 28/08/18 16:43, Rick Hegarty wrote: > Glenn, > > You raise a good point regarding the state of our test specifications, and > it had been on my mind as well. I updated the Test Specifications for Unit > Testing (JUnit and TestNG) during Release 9.0 testing, but they still need > further work: > > - The JUnit tests ( > https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/390/v/2) > take too long and need to be reduced. They also need to support JUnit 5 > functionality. > - The TestNG tests ( > > https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/title/testng_test_specification/) > need to be expanded, and support TestNG 6 functionality. > > I'll volunteer to work on those, but anyone else is welcome to participate > - just let me know. > > I'd also thought about creating additional Test Specifications for other > testing frameworks such as Spock and Mockito, but I invite feedback and > approval on that idea before we proceed. Perhaps they are not used enough > to merit Test Specifications? > > It is also important that we have volunteers for peer review of any new or > updated test specifications. We don't want to be discovering that those > test specifications are inadequate during 9.1 testing! > > Rick > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:17 AM Glenn Holmer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 08/26/2018 07:47 AM, paloris_J wrote: >>> I notice that on the archives that there is no new emails >> >> NetCAT for 9.0 has completed, so that's perfectly normal. >> >> But it's never too early to start thinking about the next NetCAT, >> especially with the shorter release cycle NetBeans will be undertaking. >> My own concern is with the test specifications, which had gotten out of >> date over the years. Now we NetBeans users are responsible for all of >> this ourselves. In the Profiler tribe, there was not even time to update >> all of the specs to reflect the current functionality of NetBeans. >> >> Are we comfortable with these specifications now? Are they the best way >> to test NetBeans releases? What should we be doing ahead of time to >> prepare for the next NetCAT? And most importantly, what is the role of >> NetCAT in the new Apache world of NetBeans? How should NetCAT fit into >> the development and release process? >> >> I'd be curious to hear people's opinions on these questions. >> >> -- >> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) >> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >> >> >
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
