Hello,
>
> [...]
> > It's *possible* that, since you're trying to access port 8080 of their
> > website, Voyager is trying to bypass your ISP's proxy server to get to
> > the site but is instead going directly TO your ISP's proxy server
> > because its probably running on port 8080. Like I said, it seems to me
> > that its possible - but I'm certainly no expert in these matters.
> >
> > You've got to wonder why www.phonenetuk.bt.com:8080 is even used,
> > anyway.
> [...]
>
> I found the same problem with http://www.bt.com/phonenetuk/ (note
> the url - is it the same page ?). I've just checked again with proxies
> enabled then disabled and got 'The request did not specify a valid
> virtual host.'
>
Yes, it is the same page, if you view frame source on
http://www.bt.com/phonenetuk/ it shows http://phonenetuk.bt.com:8080/
Just remembered, I was previously able to get further into this site.
The above url displays a form in which you enter details of the No.
being searched for. About 6 weeks ago this form was displayed, I could
fill it in and and the error "the request did not specify a valid
virtual host" did not appear until AFTER the form was submitted.
So something outside voyager must have changed during this time. Does
that shed any more light on it?
Cheers,
donny
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
