> I have seen a number of people with problems using NC3; indeed it
> appears that many of the bugs affecting NC2 (i.e. MD y2K etc) are
> still present in the NC3 collection.
>
> My question is (before I part with anymore money) Is NC3 worth it? I
> understand that:
> -MD2 still requires the collection of Y2k fixes as used with NC2
> -Contact manager still misbehaves
> -Octopus is questionable
> -Web Vision is causing some people problems
>
> My main reason for upgrading is not because of things like Javascript
> in V3 or other similar functions, nor metalweb etc; but for the
> increased stability formerly afforded by NC2 before Y2K
> patches+others were installed. Is NC3 more stable (i.e. as stable as
> NC2 *used* to be)?
>
> *Disclaimer
> In this instance, I am not having a pop at Active/Vapor/Wiles. Just
> geninly wanting to know!
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Derek
> I would say yes but thats because I have not seen a problem with
any of the DISC: NC3.
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
