Andrew Tait ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 14 Feb 2000 19:00:55 +0000: > > > >>> I am 52 years old and by no means a computer whiz kid. > > > >> > > > >> Same here, not a pace modem though, but I am 52 > > > > > > > Me too (at least 52 in March...) Bunch of old fogeys aren't we!! > > > > > > I'm a youngster (49) lets call the list the NC� 50s club :-) > > > > Sorry, 29 here. I'm kind of fond of 1970. > > Close, but no cigar. 1969 was the best year of the lot. Damn right too! Old enough to have done most things worth doing, but young enough to prevent any unwanted farts escaping. :-) -- Cheers Wayne _____________________________________________________________ NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe' message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW... Dirk Harlaar
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs... Patrick Ford
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW... John Chandler
- [netconnect] Re: Those were th... Samuel Byford
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Alexander Birrell
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Acti... David
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A ... Andrew Tait
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW... Daniel V. Smith
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs... Andrew Tait
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs... Alexander Birrell
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW...
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Acti... Steve Evans
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Tom Earl
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active George Bayliss
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Ken Woods
- [netconnect] Re: Active Ltd Vs. CW T/A Active Ken Woods
