❦ 30 mai 2016 18:27 CEST, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dich...@6wind.com> :
>>> +
>>> + rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, peer, IFF_SLAVE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> Maybe ~0U would be better than hijacking IFF_SLAVE?
> IFF_SLAVE is wrong. It's a flag here, that will be put in the ifi_change field
> not an attribute number.
There are some use of IFF_SLAVE (in bonding/bond_main.c). But, I'll
update the patch nonetheless.
--
Use free-form input when possible.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
