On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:53:10PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> >>>+  case XDP_ABORTED:
>> >>It is not clearly defined, but I believe XDP_ABORTED should also result
>> >>in a warning (calling bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act)).
>> I'll add this.
> Certainly NOT.
> XDP_ABORTED is an exception case when program does divide by zero.
> It should NOT do bpf_warn. It must drop the packet.
> We discussed it several months ago.
> See mlx4/en_rx.c for canonical implementation.
It should at least bump a counter so that the user knows that aborts
are happening.

Reply via email to