On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:56:26 -0800 Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 12:38 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > I've played with a somewhat similar patch (from Achiad Shochat) for > > mlx5 (attached). While it gives huge improvements, the problem I ran > > into was that; TX performance became a function of the TX completion > > time/interrupt and could easily be throttled if configured too > > high/slow. > > > > Can your patch be affected by this too? > > Like all TX business, you should know this Jesper. > No need to constantly remind us something very well known. Don't take is as critique Eric. I was hoping your patch would have solved this issue of being sensitive to TX completion adjustments. You usually have good solutions for difficult issues. I basically rejected Achiad's approach/patch because it was too sensitive to these kind of adjustments. > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:58:36 -0800 Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: [...] > > > > These +75% number is pktgen without "burst", and definitely show that > > your patch activate xmit_more. > > What is the pps performance number when using pktgen "burst" option? > > About the same really. About all packets now get the xmit_more effect. Perfect! > > [...] > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c > > > index 4b597dca5c52..affebb435679 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c > > [...] > > > -static inline bool mlx4_en_is_tx_ring_full(struct mlx4_en_tx_ring *ring) > > > +static inline bool mlx4_en_is_tx_ring_full(const struct mlx4_en_tx_ring > > > *ring) > > > { > > > - return ring->prod - ring->cons > ring->full_size; > > > + return READ_ONCE(ring->prod) - READ_ONCE(ring->cons) > ring->full_size; > > > } > > [...] > > > > > @@ -1033,6 +1058,14 @@ netdev_tx_t mlx4_en_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, > > > struct net_device *dev) > > > } > > > send_doorbell = !skb->xmit_more || netif_xmit_stopped(ring->tx_queue); > > > > > > + /* Doorbell avoidance : We can omit doorbell if we know a TX completion > > > + * will happen shortly. > > > + */ > > > + if (send_doorbell && > > > + dev->doorbell_opt && > > > + (s32)(READ_ONCE(ring->prod_bell) - READ_ONCE(ring->ncons)) > 0) > > > > It would be nice with a function call with an appropriate name, instead > > of an open-coded queue size check. I'm also confused by the "ncons" name. > > > > > + send_doorbell = false; > > > + > > [...] > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h > > > index 574bcbb1b38f..c3fd0deda198 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h > > > @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct mlx4_en_tx_ring { > > > */ > > > u32 last_nr_txbb; > > > u32 cons; > > > + u32 ncons; > > > > Maybe we can find a better name than "ncons" ? > > Thats because 'cons' in this driver really means 'old cons' > > and new cons = old cons + last_nr_txbb; It was not clear to me that "n" meant "new". And also not clear that this drive have an issue of "cons" (consumer) is tracking "old" cons. > > > unsigned long wake_queue; > > > struct netdev_queue *tx_queue; > > > u32 (*free_tx_desc)(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv, > > > @@ -290,6 +291,7 @@ struct mlx4_en_tx_ring { > > > > > > /* cache line used and dirtied in mlx4_en_xmit() */ > > > u32 prod ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; > > > + u32 prod_bell; > > > > Good descriptive variable name. -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer