While in RUNNING state, phy_state_machine() checks for link changes by
comparing phydev->link before and after calling phy_read_status().
This works as long as it is guaranteed that phydev->link is never
changed outside the phy_state_machine().

If in some setups this happens, it causes the state machine to miss
a link loss and remain RUNNING despite phydev->link being 0.

This has been observed running a dsa setup with a process continuously
polling the link states over ethtool each second (SNMPD RFC-1213
agent). Disconnecting the link on a phy followed by a ETHTOOL_GSET
causes dsa_slave_get_settings() / dsa_slave_get_link_ksettings() to
call phy_read_status() and with that modify the link status - and
with that bricking the phy state machine.

This patch adds a fail-safe check while in RUNNING, which causes to
move to CHANGELINK when the link is gone and we are still RUNNING.

Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurt...@neratec.com>
---
Changes to v1:
* fix kbuild test robot error: use phydev_err instead of dev_warn
  (adapt to changed struct phy_device after 4.4.21)
---
 drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
index 25f93a9..48da6e9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
@@ -1065,6 +1065,15 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
                        if (old_link != phydev->link)
                                phydev->state = PHY_CHANGELINK;
                }
+               /*
+                * Failsafe: check that nobody set phydev->link=0 between two
+                * poll cycles, otherwise we won't leave RUNNING state as long
+                * as link remains down.
+                */
+               if (!phydev->link && phydev->state == PHY_RUNNING) {
+                       phydev->state = PHY_CHANGELINK;
+                       phydev_err(phydev, "no link in PHY_RUNNING\n");
+               }
                break;
        case PHY_CHANGELINK:
                err = phy_read_status(phydev);
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to