On 02/04/2018 10:19 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:56:14 +0100
> Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not at all against such tool or test, I think
>> it's a great idea and needed. I just think that tools/lib/bpf/ is not
>> the right place to put it into lib directory. Right now, as you say,
>> it's a mixture of example code on how to use the lib, and tool at the
>> same time to dump/test load an object file with libbpf.
> Okay, to avoid polluting the directory of the library with test/samples
> programs, bow for your suggestion of moving the file to the selftests
> I'm at FOSDEM now, and I cannot send a V2 patch right now... If you
> need this in fast (due merge timing), you can make the change yourself
> and apply it... else I'll send a V2 on Tuesday.
Okay, then lets go with Tuesday since currently bpf pull-request is still
pending, thus this fix would go out with the next one anyway.