On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 02:32:27 +0100 Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 02/08/2018 12:48 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > While playing with using libbpf for the Suricata project, we had > > issues LLVM >= 4.0.1 generating ELF files that could not be loaded > > with libbpf (tools/lib/bpf/). > > > > During the troubleshooting phase, I wrote a test program and improved > > the debugging output in libbpf. I turned this into a selftests > > program, and it also serves as a code example for libbpf in itself. > > > > I discovered that there are at least three ELF load issues with > > libbpf. I left them as TODO comments in (tools/testing/selftests/bpf) > > test_libbpf.sh. I've only fixed the load issue with eh_frames, and > > other types of relo-section that does not have exec flags. We can > > work on the other issues later. > > Applied it to bpf tree, thanks Jesper! Thank you for applying this the 'bpf' tree! -- appreciate it! -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
