On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:27:57PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The codebase for timing (and lots of other things) is quite different
> between 32bit and 64bit. You're really surprised it doesn't work if you do
> such things?
>
It works, and after your remark above, I'm surprised.
Dunno about slow TSC drift though, there was not enough time passed to
detect it, and I hope we will have this problem soved in a better way
before the drift becomes visible :)
> > But the question is, why stock 2.6.18-rc7 could not use TSC on its own?
>
> x86-64 doesn't use the TSC when it deems it to not be reliable, which
> is the case on your system.
>
Could it at least print something so that I know that using TSC was
considered, but rejected?
> > What hardware exactly. Doesn't it affect only CPU? And they are not
> > know to fail before any other components.
>
> All hardware. It's basic physics.
Hm, what other hardware is affected by idle=poll? Does this option ear
out HDDs?
~
:wq
With best regards,
Vladimir Savkin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
