On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:18:15 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This is not about the name that makes sense. I think using ethX names > for wireless devices is utterly stupid, but it's what all current upstream > drivers do, and at least for WE compat we'll have to stick to it.
That's not true. Look at hostap or zd1201, for example. Also, ethX name is not needed for WE compatibility. And because of various names used by various drivers (madwifi uses ath0, for example) config scripts don't depend on ethX name today anyway. Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
