On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 11:47 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:46:48 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> > A 'flush' has a semantic implication that all entries will be removed, and 
> > it should be atomic and either succeed or fail at that granularity.
> 
> Correct.

Fair enough, does it matter that we have no way to report failure back
to users who can no longer assume success?

-Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to