Hi Jamal, J Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/08/2007 04:44:06 PM:
> That should be fine as long as the sender is running the patched > 2.6.22-rc4 Definitely :) > Thats interesting - it is possible there is transient burstiness which > fills up the ring. > My observation of your results (hence my comments): for example the > buffer size = 8B, TCP 1 process you achieve less than 70M. That is less > than 100Kpps on average being sent out. Very very tiny - so it is > interesting that it is causing a shutdown. I thought it comes to 1.147Mpps, or did I calculate wrong (70*1024*1024/8/8) ? > Also note something else strange that it is kind of strange that > something like UDP which doesnt backoff will send out less > packets/second ;-> Cannot explain that either :) > BTW, another interesting things to do is ensure that several netperfs > are running on different CPUs. My script was doing that earlier, I trimmed all that to make it easier to understand. Will post the larger version later. > no problem. Thanks, please let me know what you think of the patch I sent earlier. I am running a larger 5 iteration run with buffer sizes :8,32,128,512,1 K,4K,16K. It is going to run for around 12 hours and since I am moving house during the weekend, I will be able to look at the results only on Monday. Regards, - KK - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
