From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:35:07 -0800
> How about allowing a return value of -1 from napi_poll and letting > device check itself. It doesn't avoid the code duplication in the ->poll() fast paths. I don't care, on the other hand, if crap accumulates in non-critical slow paths like napi_disable() and dev_close(). That's why I'm suggesting solutions in that area. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
